insani
01 What it is 02 Problem 03 Cost 04 A round 05 Product 06 Intelligence
Request a pilot
The people-decision platform · for the decisions that shape your company

The most expensive
decisions are the ones
no one agrees on.

Insani lets you see what your team actually thinks, not what they think you want to hear.

Request a pilot
Not ready for a pilot? Book a 15-minute intro call
01 · So what is Insani

Nobody looks at the before.
Insani is the before.

Insani helps your team answer three questions: who agreed, what was decided, and did it work?

Not performing after six months?

Without InsaniAfter the outcome

“Bad hire.”

Nobody asks what the first six months were for, or who agreed it.

With InsaniBefore the hire

The answers start
before the verdict.

What success means
The team agrees what the first six months are for and what success looks like.
Who agreed on the role
Different expectations become one clear brief the team understands.
Did the decision work?
Compare the outcome with what you set out to achieve, including any change in priorities.

Independent views → Shared agreement → Learn what worked

Missed the target this year?

Without InsaniAfter the outcome

“Not committed.”

Nobody asks whether they and their manager ever had the same picture of what was expected.

With InsaniBefore the commitment

The answers start
before the verdict.

What each person expects
Independent views reveal whether people have the same picture.
What was actually agreed
Differences are resolved so everyone understands the commitment being made.
Did the decision work?
Review whether the target, support and priorities helped the person succeed.

Independent views → Shared agreement → Learn what worked

Everyone starts with their own view. Insani helps the team resolve the differences, agree on a decision, and learn from how it turns out.

So when the outcome arrives, you can see whether the decision was right, not just whether the person was.

02 The problem

The disagreement is there from day one. It just stays hidden until it is expensive.

01

Everyone is picturing a different person

The CEO wants growth fixed. The CFO wants costs fixed. Both nod at the same briefing, and nothing forces the difference into the open until the shortlist lands and the arguments start.

02

It surfaces too late

The real objection shows up at final interview, or six months into the wrong hire. By then the search has restarted, the agency has been blamed, and the good candidates took other offers.

03

And there is no record

When it goes wrong, try asking what was actually agreed, who decided, and why. Nobody knows. So the company makes the same mistake again, with a straight face.

03 A real search, client anonymised

One unclear role.
USD 93,900+ lost.

Six months debating the brief. An Executive Director hired, then let go at probation. The workload the role was built on never existed.

One question before the search could have changed the outcome.
Fee + six months’ salary. Before visas and insurance.

And that was one role.

How many senior hires will you make this year?

{{ hours }}Leadership hours{{ weeks }}
{{ exposure }}USD at stakeAt this case’s cost per hire
{{ candidates }} candidates · six hours each
How this is calculated

Six candidates × six interview hours per hire. Financial exposure uses USD 93,900 per hire from this case. It is an illustration of what is at stake, not a forecast of losses or savings.

04 One round, start to finish

Watch a decision happen.

It plays itself.
Select any step to jump straight to it.

Step {{ s.num }}
{{ s.title }}
Step {{ activeNum }} · {{ activeTitle }}
insani.Collecting views
Head of Operations
Gulf Hospitality Group · Decides Sarah, CEO · 2 of 3 submitted
Everyone weighs in, independently
Each decision-maker submits their own view of the role. Nobody sees the room before they answer, so what comes back is authentically theirs.
Sarah, CEOSubmitted
Layla, HRSubmitted
Farid, CFOAnswering by voice
insani.1 conflict open
Head of Operations
Alignment report · 3 of 3 submitted
What the leadership team sees
AgreedHands-on UAE and KSA operations, Arabic and English.
AgreedSuccess is attrition down on the flagship sites.
ConflictSarah wants a turnaround operator. Farid wants a safe pair of hands. Nobody knew.
82/100 brief sharpness · Buildability high
insani.Brief signed
Aligned brief
Resolve · Endorsed by all three
"Stabilise the two flagship sites first; prove turnaround capability there before any restructure."
Decided bySarah, CEO
On the recordSigned. Stamped. Permanent.
insani.Interviews · 3 of 5 in
Scorecard: operations depth
Interviewer A4
Interviewer B2
MisalignmentTwo interviewers, same candidate, scores 4 and 2.
Drift"Presence" was used to reject a candidate. It is not in the brief anyone signed.
Decision waiting on Sarah, the named decider. Never on the AI.
insani.Closed loop
Every decision. On the record.
Every call stamped: what was agreed, who decided, and why.
What was agreedStabilise the flagship sites first. Four agreements locked into the brief.
Who decidedSarah, CEO, with the reasoning attached.
Whether it workedChecked twelve months on, against the brief that was signed.
K
?
←All rounds

Head of Operations

{{ statusText }}
Organisation
Gulf Hospitality Group
Panel
{{ metaPanel }}
Decides
Sarah, CEO
Opened
{{ metaOpened }}
{{ tb.label }} ●
2/3
Submitted
Everyone weighs in, independently

Each decision-maker submits their own view of the role. Nobody sees the room before they answer, so what comes back is authentically theirs.

SA Sarah, CEO "Needs a turnaround operator who can restructure the flagship sites." Submitted
LH Layla, HR "Hands-on UAE and KSA operations, Arabic and English, on site." Submitted
FM Farid, CFO
Answering by voice
What the leadership team sees
Agreed Hands-on UAE and KSA operations, Arabic and English.
Agreed Success is attrition down on the flagship sites.
Conflict Sarah wants a turnaround operator. Farid wants a safe pair of hands. Nobody knew.
4 agreements across the team, locked into the brief. 1 conflict surfaced.
Brief sharpness
82/100
BuildabilityHigh
Conflicts1 open
Every AI estimate is labelled as an estimate. Nothing is dressed up as market data.
Aligned brief
Signed
"Stabilise the two flagship sites first; prove turnaround capability there before any restructure."
Decided by Sarah, CEO Endorsed by all three
On the
record
SIGNED. STAMPED.
PERMANENT.
Scorecard: operations depth
Interviewer A4
Interviewer B2
Scores need a why. Tap the score, speak the reasoning, done.
Misalignment
Two interviewers, same candidate, scores 4 and 2.
Drift
"Presence" was used to reject a candidate. It is not in the brief anyone signed.
Decision waiting
SA On Sarah, the named decider. Never on the AI.
Every decision. On the record.

Every call stamped: what was agreed, who decided, and why.

What was agreed Stabilise the flagship sites first. Four agreements locked into the brief.
Who decided Sarah, CEO, with the reasoning attached.
Whether it worked Checked twelve months on, against the brief that was signed.

Sample data, real product. A live walkthrough takes eight minutes. Ask for one below.

What was agreed.Who decided.Whether it worked. What was agreed.Who decided.Whether it worked. What was agreed.Who decided.Whether it worked. What was agreed.Who decided.Whether it worked. What was agreed.Who decided.Whether it worked. What was agreed.Who decided.Whether it worked.
05 Inside the product

Three views of the app, one record.

Same round, three seats. Select a tab to switch between them.

{{ v.kicker }}
{{ v.title }}
{{ v.desc }}
{{ activeViewTitle }}
insani.Draft
Head of Operations
Gulf Hospitality Group · Decides Sarah, CEO · 0 of 3 submitted
No views submitted yet
Invite the decision-makers. Each submits independently, and the map assembles once views are in. You can start the analysis with the panel you have.
Waiting for the first submission
BackgroundHead of Operations for two flagship UAE sites. Attrition is the problem to solve.
insani.Private to you
Hi Layla
Head of Operations, UAE hospitality · you run operations depth
Know the hire before you meet anyone · 4 of 5
Your stageOperations depth
How to sell this role→
What to dig on5
✓  You are set. See you in the room.
insani.Private invitation
Background for this role
Head of Operations for two flagship UAE sites. Attrition is the problem to solve.
Help shape the Head of Operations hire at Gulf Hospitality Group.
Before the search begins, the people closest to this decision are getting aligned on what good actually looks like. Your view matters.
Choose how you'd like to answer
Fill in a short form~7 min
Talk it throughSoon
Leave a voice noteSoon
←All rounds

Head of Operations

Draft K
Organisation
Gulf Hospitality Group
Panel
0 of 3 submitted
Decides
Sarah, CEO
Deadline
No deadlineSet
Opened
1 week ago
Frame & invite 0/3 Alignment report ● Resolve ● Aligned brief ●
0/3
Submitted
No views submitted yet

Invite the decision-makers. Each submits independently, and the map assembles once views are in. You can start the analysis with the panel you have.

Waiting for the first submission
Background for decision-makers
Head of Operations for two flagship UAE sites. Attrition is the problem to solve.
Edit
insani. Private to you

Hi Layla

Head of Operations, UAE hospitality · Gulf Hospitality Group · you run Operations depth and site leadership

Know the hire before you meet anyone 4 of 5
This hire Your prep Candidates (3)

Thank you, Layla, for making time to interview for our Head of Operations role: your read on operations depth is exactly what this stage needs.

Your stageOperations depth→
How to sell this role→
What to dig on5→
The hardest question you will get→
Do not promise4→
✓  You are set. See you in the room.
insani. How your input is usedPrivate invitation
Background for this role
Head of Operations for two flagship UAE sites. Attrition is the problem to solve.

Help shape the Head of Operations hire at Gulf Hospitality Group.

Before the search begins, the people closest to this decision are getting aligned on what good actually looks like. Your view matters.

Choose how you'd like to answer
Fill in a short form~7 minTap through a few guided questions.→
Talk it throughSOONAnswer Insani's questions in a quick chat.
Leave a voice noteSOONJust talk. Insani structures it; you confirm.
06 Intelligence across every people decision

Your next decision
starts wiser.

Insani connects what people wanted, what was agreed, and what actually happened. Across hiring, reviews and promotions, that history becomes evidence for the next decision.

Hiring is the starting point. The intelligence layer is being built to learn across the whole people journey.

01 · CAPTURE

What people wanted.

Independent views reveal the differences before a decision is made.

02 · REMEMBER

What was agreed.

A signed record preserves the decision, its owner and the reasons behind it.

03 · FOLLOW THROUGH

What happened.

Later evidence shows where expectations changed and whether the decision held up.

04 · LEARN

What to ask next.

Repeated patterns inform better questions, clearer criteria and future decisions.

Evidence returns to the next decision

Your company’s memory

See recurring disagreements, shifting expectations and the conditions associated with better outcomes.

A wider perspective

As eligible data grows, de-identified measures can reveal how comparable decisions behave across the region.

Learning grounded in evidence. Private responses stay private. People make the decisions.

07 Why Insani

Decisions you can stand behind.

Cheaper

Fewer wrong calls

The disagreement comes out in week one, when fixing it costs a conversation instead of a settlement.

Faster

A calmer, faster process

One agreed brief. Nobody relitigating the role at offer stage, no search quietly restarting in month four.

Accountable

Proof it worked

Months later, Insani can tell you whether the call held up and who made it. Most companies cannot answer either.

Human

Dignity by default

No machine rejects anyone. The AI informs, people decide, and candidates get treated like people you might hire next year. Because they are.

08 Request a pilot

Be one of the first fifteen teams to decide differently.

Fifteen founding companies, no more. A pilot is two live hires over eight weeks. Insani sets everything up for you: one call, and it is waiting for your team the next morning. Your decision-makers each give about four minutes. Founding companies keep the founding rate for two years.

Pilot lengthEight weeks, two live hires
Founding rateLocked for two years

Prefer to talk first? Write to kerry@insani.io and ask for the eight-minute walkthrough.

What would you like?
A pilot
A 15-minute intro call
{{ thanksTitle }}

{{ thanksBody }}

{{ formNote }}
insani Dubai, UAE kerry@insani.io The other decision-makers see the combined picture, not your raw answers. Nothing trains any AI model. © Insani 2026